“I
grew up on Ayn Rand,” Ryan said at a Washington, D.C., gathering seven years
ago honoring Rand. “The reason I got involved in public service, by and large,
if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand.” – Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 12 August
2012
Today Mr. Ryan wants to distance himself from Ayn Rand. In
an interview with the über-conservative National
Review Online, he said it was an
“urban legend” that Ayn Rand was a special obsession of his.
Unfortunately, for Mr. Ryan, his affection for Ayn Rand’s
philosophy is well documented. It has been declared in conservative
publications promoting Mr. Ryan’s fitness for office. In a 2005 speech to the
Atlas Society Mr. Ryan stated that Ms. Rand’s Atlas Shrugged was required reading for all his office interns and
staff. In 2009 Mr. Ryan produced campaign videos in which he emphatically
praises the morality of Atlas Shrugged.
Videos are still available on YouTube of both events. Randism undergirds his budget
proposals. Mr. Ryan’s brother Tobin has stated, “Paul can still quote every verse
out of Ayn Rand.”
There are no verse numbers in Ms. Rand’s writings. It is not
surprising, however, that cult members refer to them as if they are sacred
scripture.
Mr. Ryan was motivated to denounce Randism by recent
criticism of his budget proposals by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and
others who see nothing compatible between the doctrines of Ms. Rand and Jesus
Christ. (See blog archive for October 23, 2010, “The Threat.” It begins, “The
election of President Barack Obama aroused a truly un-American, anti-democratic,
virulently un-Christian ideology in our country.”) Mr. Ryan’s recent elevation
to national prominence makes his denials all the more urgent. Conservative
publications, in a fit of collective willful amnesia, are busy burnishing Mr.
Ryan’s claims to Catholicism. As understandable as these attempts at subterfuge
are, we should not be fooled. He is a Randian. The only question is, what is Atlas Shrugged?
The Plume quality paperback Centennial Edition of Ayn Rand’s
Atlas Shrugged is a monster of 1,168
pages of abused English. Ms. Rand’s characters are not believable. They act
illogically and speak unnaturally. The situations depicted are inconceivable
outside the pages of a very bad book. Nevertheless, this is Ayn Rand’s magnum
opus, the full statement of her worldview, her diagnosis of what is wrong with
the world and prescription for the cure. In what follows it may appear that too
much is attributed to characters of what is merely a work of fiction. Ms. Rand
intended Atlas Shrugged to be more
than a mere work of fiction. The cult that follows her – which includes Mr.
Ryan and every Tea Party protester with a “Who is John Galt?” sign – have
received Atlas Shrugged as fact, not
fiction.
Atlas Shrugged is
a dystopia that presents the United States as a collapsing republic surrounded
by socialistic “People’s States.” Most commentaries focus on two types of
characters Ms. Rand presents.
Foremost are the “men of the mind.” These are the
individualists, the creators, the people who live by reason. They are presented
to us in various states of egoism. The progress of the novel in part is to
follow these individuals as they grow to appreciate the importance of
selfishness. Their selfish pursuits create things and uphold the world. They
are the Titans. Ms. Rand spares no superlative as she describes these “giants
of productive energy” who are “equals” in pursuit of “higher and still higher
achievements of their own” (p. 453). These supermen do not owe anyone anything.
They are self-made, self-directed, and serve only themselves.
The second type of character is the looters. They are parasites
who live off the achievements of the “men of the mind.” Included here are
government officials. All government officials, from the bureaucrats to judges,
are corrupt, foolish, and incompetent. Civic responsibility in Ms. Rand’s world
is just an excuse the looters use to take from the creators. Included among the
looters are aesthetes, intellectuals, writers, and family members. Family
relationships are the worst. There is not one family relationship that is not
dysfunctional. That includes mother-son and husband-wife. All the siblings are
rivals.
Rand describes the looters as “…whining rotters who never
rouse themselves to any effort, who do not possess the ability of a filing
clerk, but demand the income of a company president, who drift from failure to
failure and expect [the producers] to pay their bill” (p. 453). There is more
but it does not get any more reasonable.
Between the “men of the mind” and the looters is another
category of citizen that populates the America of Ayn Rand that is not noticed
by the commentators. These citizens are far from being the equals of the “men
of the mind.” However, they have a certain Randian “moral integrity.” They are
the “serfs” (p. 11). Because of their intellectual deficiencies the “serfs” can
“never invent” anything but they “do their best, work … live by their own
effort, and … give a moment’s silent thanks to the [producer] who gave them
more than they could give him” (p. 453).
This is the America of Ayn Rand and Randians like Mr. Paul
Ryan. It is an America where the superlative “men of the mind” deserve all the
honor, glory, and money they can lay their hands on. It is an America where
only looters impose taxes or government regulations on producers. It is an
America where most people should be content to be serfs.
This is a brief description of a long book. It is fair. It
is accurate. The three types of characters are Ms. Rand’s, not mine. Every
effort has been made to describe these three types of characters in the very
terms that she either did use or would use. If the idea of an America where
serfs live in worshipful gratitude to their moneyed overlords is offensive,
blame Ms. Rand. It is her book that is faithfully described here. This is her
worldview and that of those who follow her.
F. A. Hayek published
The Road to Serfdom in 1944. In it Mr. Hayek warned that “… the collectivist
idea of empowering government with increasing economic control would lead not to
a utopia but to the horrors of Nazi Germany and fascist Italy” (from the dust
jacket of The University of Chicago Press Definitive Edition). Mr. Hayek went
on to win the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1974 and received the Presidential
Medal of Freedom in 1991. Despite his rumored admiration for Ayn Rand, I hold
Mr. Hayek as a philosopher and economist to be respected.
Nevertheless, he was wrong in The Road to Serfdom. The New Deal and the progressive economic
programs that followed, for all their faults, did not lead to fascism in
America. Most importantly, he was wrong not to recognize that there is more
than one road to serfdom. Government certainly is not the answer to all of society’s
ills, and Mr. Hayek’s warning is helpful. However, the unbridled “Capitalism”
of Ayn Rand leads us down another path to serfdom every bit as dire.
All commentators regard Mr. Paul Ryan as an intelligent man.
He is an intelligent man despite the fact that he fails to recognize that Atlas Shrugged is poorly written rubbish.
He is an intelligent man despite the fact that he failed to recognize that the
morality of Atlas Shrugged is a
complete contradiction of Christian morality. He is an intelligent man despite
the fact that he thinks citizens will not recognize his ignorance and
duplicity.
The Republican presidential ticket of Willard Mitt Romney and
Paul Davis Ryan presents this nation with the temptation to trust that there
are indeed moneyed overlords who will create jobs as long as they are not taxed
or their enterprises regulated. It is a temptation to go down a road to
serfdom.
